Liberty Matters News Service

April 10, 2001

 

Judge Finds Roadless Plan Illegal

On April 5th, US District Judge Edward Lodge said there was “strong evidence” that the rulemaking process the US Forest Service pursued to implement the Clinton Administrations sweeping roadless policy violated the National Environmental Policy Act.  Lodge said the process was hurried and that the Forest Service did not produce a “coherent proposal or meaningful dialog and that the end result was predetermined.” The roadless plan put 58 million acres of forestlands nationwide off limits to logging, road building projects and other multiple uses of the land.  The state of Idaho challenged the policy claiming the Forest Service did not allow for meaningful public comment.  The Forest Service had allowed only a two month comment period on a document 700 pages long that involved 2% of the US land mass. Lodge however, did not block the plan as requested by the state, saying he would decide that issue after reviewing the Bush administration’s status report due on May 4th.  The Bush administration has delayed implementation of the plan until May 12th in order to decide what position they will take on policy.
Judge Rebukes Roadless Plan Process

 

Greenspan Advocates New Energy Sources

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan recently stated that the current energy shortages are having a negative effect on the US economy and advocated conservation efforts and development of new energy sources.  He remarked that not only does the nation need to build more power plants, but must also secure domestic sources of coal, nuclear and other fuels to support them.  “I can’t say that we have a crisis,” he stated in response to questions raised by the Senate Energy Committee Chairman, Frank Murkowski (R-AK), but the shortages “emerged as a very significant question.”
Greenspan Echoes Bush's Strategies

 

GM Cuddles Up To Nature Conservancy

General Motors Corporation Chairman, Jack Smith, is actively working to polish his image as a pro-environment leader by aligning his company with environmental groups, notably, The Nature Conservancy.  Smith believes he and GM can help make the Earth a better place by minimizing man’s impact on the environment and because it is “morally correct.”

Mr. Smith serves as chairman of The Nature Conservancy’s “Campaign for the Last Great Places.” In an effort to gain more exposure of his active role as a “green” proponent, last week Mr. Smith held a press conference to showcase his gifts to The Nature Conservancy.  General Motors very generously provided TNC with a Chevrolet Silverado pickup and $50,000 so the workers can keep on truckin’ to “monitor rare species and control invasive species,” in western Michigan and the Upper Peninsula. 

GM has courted the environmental movement for some time.  A few years ago the company donated $1 million a year for five years to The Nature Conservancy and there is now talk that the auto company has plans to expand its support, in a big way, by donating enough money to  “underwrite preservation of a chunk of the South American rain forest, “the size of Boston.” 

In more Nature Conservancy news, TNC is suing the Southern Land Co. for trespassing on a private nature preserve and destroying leafy prairie-clover plants and their habitats.

The company admits the accident and officials say they have been trying to settle out of court with TNC since the incident occurred in 1998.  TNC people say they believe a lawsuit is the only course left.  The Conservancy has not revealed exactly what damages they are seeking.
Ford Tussles With GM Over Greenie Points
Builder Sued for Damage to Rare Plant

 

Big Bucks Drive Environmental Movement

According to the Foundation Giving Trends: Update on Funding Priorities report for 2001, grant giving to environmental organizations increased from $539.8 million in 1998 to 731.7 million in 1999.  Environmental giving makes up 6.3 percent of the total giving of philanthropic foundations.  Overall, grant-making foundations awarded $11.6 billion to 44,500 organizations in 1999.  Not surprisingly, land preservation was at the top of the list for environmental grants.  The Nature Conservancy in California topped the list receiving $25.9 million in foundation money.  Other big time recipients were: The Trust for Public Land of Georgia ($20.3 million); TPL California ($15.2 million); Leadership for Environment and Development International (LEDI - $14.6 million); and the Vermont Land Trust ($9 million).  Other primary grant winners included: the National Audubon Society; Environmental Defense Fund; National Environmental Trust; World Resources Institute and Natural Resources Defense Council.  The Packard Foundation doled out over $122.6 million, while the Rockefeller Foundation in New York gave the largest single grant to LEDI for $12.6 million.  Other major givers include: the Pew Charitable Trusts; Ford Foundation; Robert W. Woodruff Foundation; and John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.  It appears that raising big bucks is the main goal of most environmental organizations, not saving the environment.     

Republicans May Reverse 45 Clinton Rules

House Republicans have identified 45 “midnight regulations” that may get the hook.  President Clinton spent the waning hours of his presidency approving federal regulations which touch nearly every major area of government policy, a practice many find repugnant.  The leader of the review expedition, Chief Deputy Whip Roy D. Blunt (R-Mo.), criticized the former president’s actions saying,  “The kind of things you haven’t been able to do during your term, you shouldn’t try to do as you’re closing the door.”

The rules to be scrutinized include regulations imposing stricter energy standards for air conditioners and removing the restrictions placed upon snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park.

President Bush placed a 60-day moratorium on the offending rules as soon as he took office. Under the Congressional Review Act of 1996, Congress has 60 legislative days to look at the regulations and the lawmakers do not have to go through lengthy rulemaking if they want to change previous policies.

Bush’s refusal to regulate carbon dioxide levels and the withdrawal of strict federal standards for arsenic in drinking water have made environmentalists and the liberal press absolutely faint.

The New York Times warns that Republicans are in danger of self-destructing by tampering with “environmental values that command public support.”   The Sierra Club is trying to drum up opposition to the administration’s actions with a two-month radio campaign emphasizing the perception that carbon dioxide causes “global warming.”
Regulations: GOP Sets Sights on Clinton Rules

 

Bush Natural Resource Appointments

President Bush has made several natural resources-related appointments in the last few days.  Bush will nominate Cheyenne, Wyoming attorney Tom Sansonetti for assistant attorney general for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice.  Sansonetti, a former solicitor for the Interior Department and chief of staff for Rep. Craig Thomas (R-WY), led the Bush administration’s transition for the Department of Justice agency.  He is a partner with the law firm of Holland and Hart in Cheyenne, WY and was solicitor of Interior under former President Bush.    If he accepts and is confirmed, Sansonetti will be the lead attorney for the Interior, Agriculture and Energy departments and for the U.S. EPA. 

Patricia Lynn Scarlett was nominated to be assistant secretary of Interior for policy, management and budget.  Environmentalist criticize Scarlett at pro-industry, but is being heralded by several private property rights advocates as being good for the environment and people who use federal lands.  Scarlett is president and CEO of the conservative Reason Foundation in Los Angeles, which publishes Reason Magazine and has oversight of the market-oriented think tank Reason Public Policy Institute. 

William Myers III was nominated as solicitor of the Interior Department.  He was the executive director of the Public Lands Council and also works for the law firm of Holland and Hart in Boise, Idaho.

Many property rights groups are “cautiously optimistic” about the appointments, while environmental groups have criticized Bush saying is shows a “continued pattern of appointments of friends of industries with a financial stake in publicly owned resources.”