WASHINGTON -
The government sought Monday to block a federal judge's order to
greatly reduce the amount of water in the Missouri River this summer because the
order contradicts an earlier ruling from another court.
The Department of Justice asked U.S. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler to
stay an injunction she granted that requires a more natural flow along the
Missouri to protect endangered birds and fish.
Her ruling, issued Saturday, conflicts with a ruling in 2002 from the U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska that requires the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to keep enough water in the lower Missouri to allow for barge
navigation, power generation and other needs.
"The corps cannot comply with both of these orders, and as a result, may be
subject to contempt proceedings," Justice Department spokesman Blain Rethmeier
said Monday.
The corps reduced flows slightly on Saturday after Kessler, a judge from the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, granted the injunction.
Depending on whether a stay is granted, agency officials will decide Tuesday
whether to reduce the Missouri's depth - by about 6 feet at Kansas City, Mo.,
for example - to comply with the judge's order.
Kessler said in her ruling on Saturday that injury to wildlife - the least
tern, piping plover and pallid sturgeon - will be irreparable without curtailing
the Missouri's flow.
American Rivers, Environmental Defense, the Isaac Walton League, the National
Wildlife Federation and a half-dozen other groups are suing to force the changes
in river flow, which they contend are required by the federal Endangered Species
Act.
"This ruling will prevent the Corps from wasting valuable water in a drought
to float the mere four towboats actually using the river right now," said Tim
Searchinger, an attorney for Environmental Defense. Each boat pulls several
barges, each of which can carry dozens of containers.
The lower reaches of the river through Missouri, Kansas, Iowa and Nebraska
will be too shallow for barge tows if flows are reduced to levels sought by
conservation groups, critics said.
"The reliability of the river for barge transportation has been adversely
affected over the last few years, and this particular ruling just adds insult to
injury," Randy Asbury, who heads the Missouri-based Coalition to Protect the
Missouri River, said Monday.
Lower Missouri states say the more natural flow sought by environmentalists,
who also are demanding a spring rise in water levels every third summer to mimic
runoff from melting mountain snow, will flood homes and farmland and devastate
the barge shipping industry.
It would take about two weeks for water reductions made at the Gavins Point
Dam on the border between South Dakota and Nebraska to reach Kansas City, where
the Missouri's depth would drop from 14 feet to 8 feet.
A barge loaded with 134 truckloads of grain was waiting in Omaha Monday for a
towboat to bring it down the Missouri, corps spokesman Paul Johnston said. The
nearest towboat was in Kansas City and can't make the trip if levels drop, he
said.
In her ruling issued Saturday, Kessler acknowledged barge companies will lose
revenues, water quality may suffer and consumers may pay more for power this
summer along the Missouri River.
But Kessler said benefits of lower flows outweigh the costs.
"There is no dollar value that can be placed on the extinction of an animal
species - the loss is to our planet, our children and future generations,"
Kessler wrote.
Kessler said conservationists probably will win the lawsuit against the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers because the corps was ordered in 2000 to switch to a
more natural flow, with heavier water releases every third spring and lighter
flows each summer.
The order came from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which said in its
biological opinion that only by implementing the changes can the piping plover,
interior least tern and pallid sturgeon be protected. The animals are on the
federal list of endangered or threatened species.
The Bush administration indefinitely postponed the changes to the river
mandated by the order by initiating talks between the corps and the wildlife
service. The service agreed this year to allow higher flows for this summer
only, but the judge called that decision baseless.
"The public interest is served when the legislation that Congress has enacted
is complied with, and federal agencies fulfill their congressional mandates,"
Kessler wrote.
ON THE NET
Army Corps of Engineers Missouri River Region: http://www.nwd.usace.army.mil/
American Rivers: http://www.americanrivers.org
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia: http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material
herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information
go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml