SAN FRANCISCO (AP)
- Thwarting environmentalists, a federal appeals court here Monday upheld the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's view that the Northern Goshawk don't need
federal protection throughout the West.
The 3-0 decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came after 13 years
of extensive litigation, in which environmentalists wanted the government to
list the large raptor, usually found in the western United States, as endangered
or threatened.
A contrary ruling could have impacted logging throughout the West. The
American Forest & Paper Association filed briefs in the case, urging the
court to side with the Fish and Wildlife Service's decision in 1998 not to grant
goshawk protection under the Endangered Species Act. "Clearly, that
was a concern of ours," said Michael Klein, a spokesman for the Forest &
Paper Association, which represents 150 wood, pulp and paper companies, along
with forest landowners. "But, where we were coming from, was this was
essentially a frivolous lawsuit brought by activists who didn't know what they
were talking about."
The decision upholds U.S. District Judge Helen Frye of Oregon, who in 2001
ruled that Fish and Wildlife Service officials did not "arbitrarily and
capriciously" reject a petition by several environmental groups to have the
goshawk listed.
Appeals Judge Donald P. Lay wrote the raptor has indeed declined since
"European settlement of the western states." But Lay concluded the government
undertook sufficient studies to determine "that the goshawk population is
relatively stable at the broadest scale."
The Northern Goshawk is a bird of prey. It sports a black crown and cheeks
and has a broad, white stripe over the eye. A male goshawk's wingspan typically
reaches 39 inches. Female wingspans measure to 45 inches.
The U.S. Forest Service considers goshawks a sensitive species, a cautionary
and pre-emptive threshold before a species reaches the threatened or endangered
list.
Matt Kenna, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, which sought
the listing, said a ruling favoring goshawk "would have meant a reduction of
logging."
"We think that was one of the reasons for the decision," he said. The center
was considering its legal options, he said.
Blain Rethmeier, a Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman, said the government
was "pleased with the decision."
In 1998, seven years after the lawsuit was filed, the Clinton administration
concluded that data did not indicate the goshawk was in danger of extinction or
likely to become so in the foreseeable future.
Generally, goshawk live in mature and old growth forests in all western
states. Environmentalists asserted that it numbers have plummeted.
They say it has vanished from Southern California and the coastal mountains
of Central California and has been virtually eradicated from the coast mountain
ranges of Northern California, Oregon and Washington.
The center said the raptor has declined in Montana, Idaho, Arizona and New
Mexico. Its viability is threatened in Nevada, Utah and Wyoming.
The case is Center for Biological Diversity v. Badgley, 01-35829.
---
Editors: David Kravets has been covering state and federal courts for a
decade.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material
herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information
go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml