|
Parma homeowner sued over
wetlands
By Corydon Ireland Staff Writer
(October 10, 2003) PARMA In
an unusual legal action against a citizen, state environmental authorities are
suing a homeowner in this lakeside town for damaging a protected wetland.
Nancy Cady bought her new subdivision home sy 22 North Shore Drive in
June 2001, aware that a conservation easement protected a marshy portion of the
lot leading to Lake Ontario, court papers say.
The following January,
the state Department of Environmental Conservation granted Cady a permit to
build a 6-foot-wide trail through the wetland.
In July, DEC staff
observed a cleared area 25 feet wide behind the house, and discussed the limits
of the permit with Cady.
In October 2002, a second DEC inspection found
a path 12 feet wide.
State law protects freshwater wetlands that are
12.4 acres or larger and smaller ones of unusual local
importance.
Ken Campagna, Cadys fiancè, who lives at
the house and dealt with the DEC, said the path is narrower than the agency
claims and that the cleared area behind the house was left by construction
crews.
I cant believe how far (the DEC) is taking this, for
something so small, said Campagna, who admitted clearing a small patch of
weeds within a few feet of the patio as protection against
his asthma.
He and Cady have an appointment with a lawyer next week,
and say they will fight the charges with pictures and documents.
The
conservation easement was all there in advance of Cady buying the
house, said Linda E. White, the Buffalo-based assistant attorney general of
counsel who filed the suit on behalf of the DEC. I dont know what
her arguments will be, but (she) always had the choice of not buying the
lot.
Four other lots in the Payne Beach Estates Subdivision are
restricted by the wetlands conservation
easement. The development, with houses selling for up to $1.2
million, contains 116 acres of wetlands.
Cady was served with the legal
papers Tuesday, and has 30 days to respond.
If she is found liable in
state Supreme Court, Cady could be fined $3,000, and $1,000 for each day of the
violation, based on two other counts. The state would also require her to
restore the wetland.
This is not a typical case referred to
us, said Judith Enck, a spokeswoman for the state Attorney Generals
Office in Albany. But we took this (to uphold) the integrity of the state
wetlands law.
Wetlands provide rich habitat, temper stormwater
runoff and buffer shorelines from erosion.
The DEC bent over
backwards to get the damage to the wetland addressed before resorting to
legal action, said Enck. No one should be surprised here.
CIRELAND@DemocratandChronicle.com
[Non-text portions of
this message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOTE:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|