Military coexists with endangered pronghorn on bombing range
By ARTHUR H. ROTSTEIN, Associated
Press Writer
Saturday October 18, 2003, 11:55:10
AM
BARRY M. GOLDWATER RANGE, Ariz. (AP) - It's not yet sunrise but Pam
Landin's day is already swinging into high gear on this southern Arizona
military range.
She has hiked 200 feet up a rocky slope to a ledge on Observation
Point Echo, overlooking a vast flat landscape where Air Force pilots routinely
practice bombing runs. With binoculars and a high-powered scope she searches
the desert below for endangered Sonoran pronghorns.
The presence of any of the deer-like animals within three kilometers
of a nearby array of targets resembling tanks can force pilots to detour to
other sites on the Air Force's 1.1 million-acre portion of the range, or even
scrub their missions. The Air Force and the Marines, who also use
part of this range, are key players in efforts by federal and state agencies to
ensure the survival of the fleet, elusive pronghorns.
Both military branches provide money for studies and other support,
even pitching in thousands of dollars to drill desert wells in an adjacent
wildlife refuge to irrigate plots of forage for the animals, whose population
has been decimated by drought.
Air Force Col. James Uken, the Goldwater range's management officer,
said that for the Air Force's part, "when you total up all the different
projects we've been involved in over the period of time, I'm sure the dollar
value exceeds $1 million."
That doesn't include the cost for the pronghorn spotters - four or
five biologists including Landin - who climb observation points overlooking the
north and south tactical ranges at least once every weekday a few hours before
every bombing run.
"The Air Force spends a lot of money annually simply to avoid the
rare, and probably unlikely, scenario of actually harming a pronghorn," said
John Hervert, wildlife program manager for the Arizona Department of Game and
Fish, a principal in a multiagency pronghorn recovery team.
So does the Marine Corps, which manages another nearly 692,000 acres
on the Goldwater Range's western end.
"It's something that they've become accustomed to deal with," said
John Morgart, coordinator of the Sonoran pronghorn recovery team for the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. "I have a lot of confidence in my military
counterparts."
The goat-sized Sonoran pronghorn, which is related to the antelope but
is genetically distinct, is in a critical period.
The U.S. population numbered about 138 less than two years ago, but
last winter it crashed to an estimated 21 after more than a year without rain.
Northern Mexico has fewer than 300 Sonoran pronghorns.
But the Arizona survivors also produced eight to 10 fawns this spring,
with most apparently surviving so far.
Survival of all the fawns would be phenomenal, especially since there
was concern whether the animals would even mate last year, said Uken, who
considers himself part of the recovery team.
The Air Force has been using pronghorn spotters for at least six
years, since Fish and Wildlife issued a biological opinion under the Endangered
Species Act as part of a settlement with Defenders of Wildlife, an
environmental group.
"We stood up to that responsibility at least six years ago, and have
been doing so ever since," Uken said. "We accept that as part of our doing
business, our operations."
On average, 7 percent of all scheduled bombing missions are scrubbed
because of pronghorns near target sites, and another 26 percent are rerouted to
secondary target areas, he said.
There are 45,000 flights a year over the Air Force side of the
Goldwater Range and 18,000 flights a year over the Marines' side, Uken said.
Hervert noted the pronghorns disproportionately favor the Air Force's
north and south tactical ranges, where bombs tear up creosote, a plant that
hinders the pronghorns' ability to see predators. The bombs, other munitions
and flares also gouge out craters that hold rainwater and foster growth of
plants the animals favor.
"In doing their job, they've created habitat that is attractive to the
animals," Morgart said.
On a recent day, Landin spotted a cluster of tiny specks - five
white-rumped pronghorns - bedded in vegetation near a small rocky formation
nicknamed Peanut Hill, four or five miles west of her location.
Those pronghorns and two others have been hanging around Peanut Hill
for about a month, she said.
Noah Matson, a Washington-based public lands management specialist
with Defenders of Wildlife, said the Air Force and Marines are making an effort
to help the recovery program.
"We think the Air Force monitoring program is a really important part
of the effort," Matson said. "And we don't think it has a tremendous impact on
the Air Force training."
Ron Pearce, civilian manager for the nearly 692,000-acre Marine Corps'
portion of the Goldwater Range, said the Corps first consulted with Fish and
Wildlife in 1988 over the pronghorn and has given more than a dozen research
and recovery grants since 1994 to help the animal.
In all, the Marine Corps has spent about $750,000 on pronghorn
recovery, of which only $83,000 was required, he said.
"We did it because it was the right thing to do, and we did it because
we had the resources and we had the authority," Pearce said.
Legislation now being sought by the Department of Defense seeks
exemptions to key environmental laws, contending they hamper the military's
ability to train. One of five provisions still before Congress allows for
exemption of some military land from critical habitat provisions of the
Endangered Species Act.
But biologists and military officials alike say neither Air Force nor
Marine operations on the Goldwater Range concerning the Sonoran pronghorn would
be affected, primarily because critical habitat was never designated.
"I think the people I deal with would continue to see the positives of
having pronghorn monitoring out there," Morgart said. "The military doesn't
want to be seen as uncaring of the environment or endangered species."
[Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment
to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml