News Service April 22, 2003

 

A New Wine From Enviros


Rich Lowry
April 18, 2003

So many Americans are engaged in a boycott of French wine at the moment that
some French importers are pressuring President Jacques Chirac to cry Uncle
(Sam). But environmentalists, as ever, have different priorities than the
rest of the country: They are busy protesting Napa Valley wine.
The picturesque trellised fields there make most people, especially anyone
with a taste for cabernet, consider Northern California closer to heaven
than any place on Earth since Eden. But the fields are maligned by greens as
"alcohol farms," the environmentally catastrophic result of "the graping of
the land."

Now, there's something amusing about sensitive liberals in one of the
world's great bastions of progressive thinking warring among themselves. The
stereotypical Northern California vineyard owner is a wealthy yuppie who
appreciates the outdoors and the finer things and wants to live within an
hour's drive of San Francisco, the Left Coast's left-most city. It must be
discomfiting for him suddenly to be considered no better than a
smoke-belching coal-plant operator.

But hold your amusement. California wine has, during the past couple of
decades, become as American as baseball, apple pie, Budweiser and Jack
Daniel's. The vineyards are threatened by an environmental extremism that
can properly be considered part of -- together with smoking bans at bars,
hamburger lawsuits and all the rest of it -- "A War on Anything You Might
Happen to Find Pleasurable."

One charge against the vineyards -- some of which are built on the sides of
slopes -- is that they might dump dirt into streams, fouling the water. It
has happened occasionally. But the definitions of water pollution and of
what constitutes a stream -- practically any rivulet of rain runoff -- have
become maniacally broad.

Environmentalists complain that the vineyards are a monoculture, i.e., just
one, ecologically sterile, crop. Although some of the newer vineyards have
eaten into forests, most of them have replaced other monocultures, apple
orchards and the like.

Finally, greens worry about endangered species. Heaven forbid that a mud
puddle might be disturbed that provides a habitat to a vernal pool of fairy
shrimp, but it is only by stretching the federal Endangered Species Act to
the point of absurdity that vineyards can be portrayed as despoilers of the
planet.

As the wine industry has boomed in Northern California in recent years
(fueled by annoying Internet millionaires), an important shift in perception
has taken place. Vineyards were once viewed as an alternative to tract
housing and other nasty development, but now are themselves seen as nasty
development.

That makes them vulnerable to every tool of harassment in the
environmentalist arsenal: numerous lawsuits (the Sierra Club has sued the
local government and growers), zealously applied federal regulations and
ever-tightening local land-use and permitting rules.

Starting a vineyard is inherently dicey. It usually means borrowing a lot of
money to buy land that costs about $100,000 an acre, and then it take years
to get the vines growing high-quality grapes. On top of it all, now there's
the expense of hiring lawyers, endangered-species specialists and perhaps
fish biologists, and the risk of unplanned delays imposed by aggressive
regulators. "It has become a very involved legal, scientific and technical process that
stretches over months and maybe years. It renders many properties
potentially uncommercial," says Christopher Hermann, who heads the West
Coast law firm Stoel Rives' wine-law group. (Yes, there is such a thing --
without it, unfortunately, vineyards wouldn't stand a chance.)
For vineyard opponents, putting property out of commission is the point.
Some critics have taken to calling the growers "merchants of death," as if
they're selling crack. They apparently haven't gotten the word that a glass
of wine a day can help prevent heart disease, never mind pleasing the pallet
and soothing the spirit.

Patriotic, common-sensical imbibers should have their marching orders:
Boycott French wine to annoy Jacques Chirac and his countrymen. Drink
Californian to annoy the enviro-weenies.


Rich Lowry is editor of National Review, a TownHall.com member group.
©2003 King Features Syndicate



Home

Send mail to the webmaster  with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2001 Liberty Matters