A
New Wine From Enviros
Rich Lowry
April 18, 2003
So many Americans are engaged in a boycott of French wine at the
moment that
some French importers are pressuring President Jacques Chirac to cry
Uncle
(Sam). But environmentalists, as ever, have different priorities
than the
rest of the country: They are busy protesting Napa Valley wine.
The picturesque trellised fields there make most people, especially
anyone
with a taste for cabernet, consider Northern California closer to
heaven
than any place on Earth since Eden. But the fields are maligned by
greens as
"alcohol farms," the environmentally catastrophic result
of "the graping of
the land."
Now, there's something amusing about sensitive liberals in one of
the
world's great bastions of progressive thinking warring among
themselves. The
stereotypical Northern California vineyard owner is a wealthy yuppie
who
appreciates the outdoors and the finer things and wants to live
within an
hour's drive of San Francisco, the Left Coast's left-most city. It
must be
discomfiting for him suddenly to be considered no better than a
smoke-belching coal-plant operator.
But hold your amusement. California wine has, during the past couple
of
decades, become as American as baseball, apple pie, Budweiser and
Jack
Daniel's. The vineyards are threatened by an environmental extremism
that
can properly be considered part of -- together with smoking bans at
bars,
hamburger lawsuits and all the rest of it -- "A War on Anything
You Might
Happen to Find Pleasurable."
One charge against the vineyards -- some of which are built on the
sides of
slopes -- is that they might dump dirt into streams, fouling the
water. It
has happened occasionally. But the definitions of water pollution
and of
what constitutes a stream -- practically any rivulet of rain runoff
-- have
become maniacally broad.
Environmentalists complain that the vineyards are a monoculture,
i.e., just
one, ecologically sterile, crop. Although some of the newer
vineyards have
eaten into forests, most of them have replaced other monocultures,
apple
orchards and the like.
Finally, greens worry about endangered species. Heaven forbid that a
mud
puddle might be disturbed that provides a habitat to a vernal pool
of fairy
shrimp, but it is only by stretching the federal Endangered Species
Act to
the point of absurdity that vineyards can be portrayed as despoilers
of the
planet.
As the wine industry has boomed in Northern California in recent
years
(fueled by annoying Internet millionaires), an important shift in
perception
has taken place. Vineyards were once viewed as an alternative to
tract
housing and other nasty development, but now are themselves seen as
nasty
development.
That makes them vulnerable to every tool of harassment in the
environmentalist arsenal: numerous lawsuits (the Sierra Club has
sued the
local government and growers), zealously applied federal regulations
and
ever-tightening local land-use and permitting rules.
Starting a vineyard is inherently dicey. It usually means borrowing
a lot of
money to buy land that costs about $100,000 an acre, and then it
take years
to get the vines growing high-quality grapes. On top of it all, now
there's
the expense of hiring lawyers, endangered-species specialists and
perhaps
fish biologists, and the risk of unplanned delays imposed by
aggressive
regulators. "It has become a very involved legal, scientific
and technical process that
stretches over months and maybe years. It renders many properties
potentially uncommercial," says Christopher Hermann, who heads
the West
Coast law firm Stoel Rives' wine-law group. (Yes, there is such a
thing --
without it, unfortunately, vineyards wouldn't stand a chance.)
For vineyard opponents, putting property out of commission is the
point.
Some critics have taken to calling the growers "merchants of
death," as if
they're selling crack. They apparently haven't gotten the word that
a glass
of wine a day can help prevent heart disease, never mind pleasing
the pallet
and soothing the spirit.
Patriotic, common-sensical imbibers should have their marching
orders:
Boycott French wine to annoy Jacques Chirac and his countrymen.
Drink
Californian to annoy the enviro-weenies.