|
News Service May 13, 2003
PARK WARS, PART 1 Debate Roars Over Future Of
Yosemite
Protesters, communities mobilize to fight Clinton-era anti-car
plan
Posted: May 12, 2003 1:00 a.m.
Eastern
Editor's note: This is the first of a two-part series
exploring the controversy surrounding a massive plan underway by the U.S. Park
Service to reduce the level of human access to America's most beloved national
park – Yosemite. In this installment, WND explains the history of the plan and
the efforts of local communities to put a stop to it.
By Sarah Foster © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
In late December 1996, a tropical
storm moved in from the Pacific, pouring rain across California and melting the
snowpack that covers the Sierra Nevada Mountains. By New Years Day, the Merced
River that flows through Yosemite National Park in the central part of the state
had risen nearly a dozen feet above its banks, inundating the seven-square-mile
Yosemite Valley, uprooting trees and destroying campgrounds, dozens of
buildings, roads, and sewer and water systems.
It was Yosemite's worst flood in 80 years, and damages were
estimated at $178 million – 11 times the park's annual budget. The park was
closed for three months. Local communities and businesses that depend on tourism
were deeply impacted, and it was expected that the National Park
Service would move quickly to repair the damage to
America's favorite, very special park.
That didn't happen.
The Park Service requested funding from Congress to restore
the campsites and other lost infrastructure, and in June 1997 Congress awarded a
flood-recovery package of $187,321,000, with the understanding the money would
be used for reconstruction and emergency expenses resulting from flooding. But
the Park Service had in mind a different kind of restoration, and instead of
carrying out its assigned tasks embarked on a three-year planning process on how
best to restore the park's "natural environment" – which would mean the way it
was before white explorers and settlers entered the valley.
Eighteen public hearings and many thousands of comments
later, the Park Service brought forth the Yosemite Valley
Plan, an ambitious proposal built on a General
Management Plan put together during the Carter administration and never fully
implemented.
The earlier 1980 plan called for the elimination or
relocation of hundreds of buildings and campsites as well as the eventual
removal of private vehicles from the park and reliance on mass transit systems.
Deploring the "noise, the smell and the environmental degradation caused by
thousands of vehicles," its authors held that the "ultimate solution" for parks
in general, but especially Yosemite, "specifically rests upon integration with
regional transportation systems."
Implementation of the Yosemite Plan, originally estimated to
cost $343 million, will cost at least $442 million, and some critics predict it
could go as high as $1 billion. Yet the destroyed campgrounds (a total of 361
campsites) will not be rebuilt, since the decision was made not to rebuild on
the floodplain, but rather to restore the natural habitat and "hydrological
processes" of the river. The sewer infrastructure, which was severely damaged,
has not been properly repaired and is so poorly maintained the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board voted to fine the Park Service for
negligence because of ongoing sewage spills.
This was definitely not what the public nor Congress
expected, but it had its supporters in the environmental movement. At a recent
congressional hearing, Jay Watson, California/Nevada regional director for the
Wilderness
Society, applauded the Park Service for its
decision, reiterating remarks he had made on other occasions.
"… there was a silver lining to the storm clouds that
produced those floods – a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transform into
reality what had long been a grand but elusive vision for Yosemite," Watson
testified.
The vision, he said, was "captured" in five key goals that
were articulated in the 1980 General Management Plan, goals that would: "Reclaim
priceless natural beauty, allow natural processes to prevail, promote visitor
understanding and enjoyment, markedly reduce traffic congestion and reduce
crowding."
"In other words," said Watson, "a more natural Yosemite,
where hydrological and other natural processes operate freely, a Yosemite with
less asphalt, fewer automobiles, less development, less congestion, a Yosemite
with an improved and enhanced visitor experience. Fortunately, the National Park
Service seized upon the opportunity presented by the flood. ..."
To achieve this "elusive vision," the Yosemite Valley Plan –
unveiled for final comment in March 2000 by then-Interior Secretary Bruce
Babbitt and formally adopted in the waning days of the Clinton administration –
mandates a host of major changes in park management policies that will radically
limit the public's access to the 761,000-acre park and the much-loved,
glacier-carved valley at its center and impose what critics regard as Draconian
restrictions on what folks may do once they're there.
Besides not rebuilding the wasted campgrounds, the plan for
a "more natural Yosemite" calls for an approximately 50 percent reduction in the
number of rooms, cabins and campsites for overnight accommodation from what was
available before the flood, the removal of historic bridges, roads and parking
spaces at scenic spots, with parking centralized in a 550-car lot at Curry
Village.
"Who else [but the Clinton administration] would have the
brass to say that they are going to relieve congestion by closing miles of roads
and relieve overcrowded parking by eliminating more than a thousand parking
spaces?" quipped economist Thomas Sowell in his weekly column, upon learning of
the details of the plan.
Now in the third year of the Bush administration the plan is
very much alive and being implemented. There are 15 projects that comprise the
first phase of implementation, and these include a redesign of trails and
approaches to lower Yosemite Falls, building a new Indian cultural center,
removing a dam on the Merced River and buying new shuttle buses. The tab for all
15 is reported as being from $105.2 million to $110 million. The Oakland Tribune
reports that will include repairs to facilities damaged in the 1997 flood –
leaving unasked the question of what happened to the money originally
appropriated for that purpose.
Following the dictates from the Carter era, a key element of
the plan is an urban-style transit system, with people bought into the park on
buses and a fleet of shuttle buses that will haul visitors from one scenic
destination to another. (The Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System – or YARTS – is already operating). The plan – in particular, the
shuttle bus program – has drawn the fire of numerous critics like Sowell, one of
them being WorldNetDaily columnist Barbara Simpson.
A few months after President Bush was inaugurated, Simpson
denounced the over-1000-page plan in her weekly commentary, ripping its authors
for their "ultimate goal of turning Yosemite National Park into a sort of living
museum," the idea being "to remove virtually all human imprint."
Once the plan is fully implemented it will be "almost
impossible for anyone to enjoy [Yosemite] in the manner that's been available to
visitors since the 1800s," she wrote.
"If those changes are made, it will be harder to get
in – raise the entry fees, prohibit certain traffic and reduce available roads;
impossible to drive in – can't have those exhaust fumes; almost
impossible to camp in – people can be so messy and campfires pollute;
impossible to horseback ride in – horses trample the brush and manure
spreads seeds not native to the area; difficult to hike or bike through –
those paths deface meadows and woods; or even raft in the river – rafters
disturb the fish and disturb the beaches. They actually want to remove restroom
facilities! Need I go on? I think you get the drift."
The changes, Simpson warned, were right then being put into
effect.
"It's already started. The entry fee was jacked up to $20
per vehicle [from $5]. A number of housekeeping camping units removed. Two
entire river-area campgrounds totally removed. The only gas station in
the valley closed. Campfires restricted. Stables and trail-rides reduced. Some
roads closed to motor vehicles."
Stealing a park
Chuck Cushman, founder and executive director of the
American Land
Rights Association, a non-profit, public-interest
advocacy group based in Battle Ground, Wash., has made a career of helping
private land owners defend their property rights against government agencies and
fending off threats to the use of federal lands through plans like the one being
imposed on Yosemite Valley. When it comes to discussing Park Service policies
and actions, he is not one to mince words.
"What they're doing is nothing less than stealing a national
park from the people," he said bluntly, when contacted for comment.
"They're taking out 60 percent of the car-accessible,
drive-in family campsites over what were there in 1980 when the General
Management Plan was drafted, including all the river campsites, which is where
people like to camp. They're reducing the parking by 75 percent of what was
there in 1980 – and with no parking people will be forced to use buses, which
will be especially hard for the handicapped and the elderly and young families.
That's the killer. What young family is going to want to travel around the park
like that, with babies and small children, loaded down with diaper bags, picnic
supplies and all their other gear? It's nuts."
Cushman said that he's not opposed to shuttle buses, per se,
and sees them as a "good option" for getting about, but maintains they should
not be the only available means of transportation in the valley. Instead of
providing a valuable supplement to private vehicles, the Park Service is engaged
in "social engineering through forced busing – and forced busing didn't work for
the schools in Los Angeles and it won't work here."
Opposition builds
With implementation well underway, any opposition at this
point would seem futile. But local critics of the plan are cautiously optimistic
if they and other Americans make enough noise the Bush administration will
scuttle it and start the planning process over from scratch.
Their hopes got a boost recently when Rep. George
Radanovich, R-Calif., whose district encompasses the
park, announced he would hold a field hearing in Yosemite Valley on the
controversial blueprint with its $442 million price tag, focusing on the camping
and transportation elements.
Radanovich, who has represented the district since 1994,
moved into the chairmanship of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation
and Public Lands in September 2001, a position from which he can more actively
address the concerns of constituents and communities whose tourism-dependent
economies have been severely hurt by decline in park attendance over the past
seven years.
From a peak of 4.2 million in 1996, the number of visitors
fell to a low 3.4 million last year and is expected to drop to 3.1 million in
2004. There was compelling evidence that that would-be visitors were of the
erroneous impression they couldn't bring in their cars and would be forced to
rely on public transportation and shuttle buses.
A subcommittee hearing was an opportunity too good to be
missed, a chance to generate some of the necessary "noise."
"We realized there was going to be this hearing and that we
needed to get something going to make sure we were properly heard," hotel owner
Peggy Mosley told WorldNetDaily. "We knew we had to create some controversy
since the squeaky wheel is the one that gets the grease."
Mosley, who with her husband, Grover, owns and manages the
historic Groveland Hotel, 23 miles west of Yosemite on Highway 120, had been
invited by Radanovich to testify as a representative of the local business
community and the county of Tuolumne.
"What boggles me the most is that we Americans are so
complacent; we just sit and let things happen," Mosley exclaimed. "Then when
it's all over and we don't like something, we say 'Why didn't somebody tell me?'
Well, that's what we're trying to do – tell people what's going on and what's
about to happen to them, and that their freedom is being taken away."
Business leaders who share the same concerns as the Mosleys
and anti-plan activists in the Yosemite gateway communities such as Mariposa,
Oakhurst and Bass Lake formed Visitors and Communities for an Open Yosemite, an
advocacy organization for raising public awareness about the plans being
implemented in Yosemite and the impact these were already having on the local
economies.
To get things moving, the newly formed group asked Cushman
to be their spokesperson and all-around organizer.
A large, burly man, his enemies have nicknamed him "Mr.
Rent-a-Riot" because of the "in-your-face" demonstrations he puts together and
his ability to inspire willing but often reticent "stakeholders" to become
confrontational activists. Whatever they call him, Cushman stresses that any
demonstration he organizes is peaceful: noisy maybe, confrontational and
attention grabbing – but never violent.
"We'd heard he's created all kinds of controversy, and we're
very much aware that that's the kind of thing we need to get public attention,"
said Mosley.
That the Yosemite Valley Plan has been finalized doesn't
matter, Cushman told WorldNetDaily.
"Plans can be changed, and we're urging Congress to declare
a moratorium on this one and do a top-to-bottom review," he said. "The process
started during the Carter administration and was finalized during Clinton's,
which is why we think this administration should take a look at it. We're
asking, why is this administration carrying out Clinton's Land Legacy
Initiative?"
As he sees it, the future of Yosemite Valley and the park
itself is a nationwide issue, for if the plan's implementation is not stopped,
he says, Americans will not be able to enjoy their parks in the future.
"The plan will be the model for all parks if the Park
Service is allowed to get away with this," he warned. "So if people want to keep
their parks open, they'll have to stand up and let their congressmen know that's
what they want."
On Earth Day, with his help, members of the newly formed
Visitors and Communities for an Open Yosemite did just that.
Tomorrow: In the trenches: Activists point out human toll
to government's plan, protest with ball and
chain.
Sarah
Foster is a staff reporter for
WorldNetDaily.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOTE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material
herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information
go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|