More than 6,000 acres of
public and private land in San Diego and Orange counties would be protected as
"critical habitat" for the endangered San Diego fairy shrimp under a proposal by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The proposal, issued Tuesday, includes land in Carlsbad, Chula Vista,
San Marcos, Ramona and San Diego. It is the latest step in five years of
litigation among builders, environmental activists and the federal agency over
protecting the habitat of the fairy shrimp.
The inch-long crustacean lives in vernal pools that fill with water
during the rainy season and dry up during the summer.
Scientists estimate that 95 percent or more of the region's vernal
pools have been destroyed. Many of the few that remain are on mesas, flat land
that is often considered prime for development.
Land designated as critical habitat may be developed. However,
measures must be taken to protect the habitat.
Of the 6,098 acres the federal agency wants to designate, 5,735 are
in San Diego County.
Activists with the Center for Biological Diversity based in Tucson,
Ariz., say such protections are important to save the fairy shrimp from
extinction.
David Hogan, spokesman for the San Diego office of the Center for
Biological Diversity, said the federal government's proposal to designate some
6,000 acres for the fairy shrimp doesn't go nearly far enough. He said five
times that amount would be more appropriate.
At one point, in March 2000, 36,501 acres were under consideration by
the Fish and Wildlife Service as critical habitat for the fairy shrimp, Hogan
said.
However, the roughly 6,000 acres proposed for protection this week
represent a substantial increase from the 4,025 acres the Fish and Wildlife
Service had designated in October 2000.
Much of the additional acreage is in South County, near the border.
Some of the sites considered, but excluded from the proposal, include
land on Miramar Marine Corps Air Station, training areas at Camp Pendleton and
the Navy's radio receiving facility in Coronado.
Military property in Coronado and at Miramar already has
natural-resource management plans, said Jane Hendron of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service office in Carlsbad. The decision to exclude the Camp Pendleton
training area was made "in light of national security interests," Hendron said.
The Building Industry Association of San Diego does not yet have a
comment on the federal government's proposal. Matthew Adams, director of
governmental affairs for the association, said he is still reviewing it.
He did say that designation of land as critical habitat in general,
however, could drive up building costs in a region where housing prices are
already soaring.
"We have a very small pie in terms of land that's available for
development," Adams said. "Critical habitat shrinks the pie even more, which
means what's left to build on gets even more expensive."
The dispute over protecting the habitat of the fairy shrimp began in
1997, when the federal government listed the species as endangered but did not
designate any of its habitat for protection.
The Center for Biological Diversity sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. In response, the agency made a critical-habitat designation in October
2000.
Soon after, the construction industry, including the Building
Industry Association of San Diego, sued the Fish and Wildlife Service, saying
the agency didn't adequately consider the economic costs of protecting the land.
As a result, the Fish and Wildlife Service is re-examining its
designated habitat for the fairy shrimp and the economic impacts. A court order
requires the agency to come up with a new designation of critical habitat by
April 2004.
Kathryn Balint: (619) 293-2848; kathryn.balint@uniontrib.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml