Airport board joins effort to sue over strict
salamander rules
By Janene Scully -- Staff
Writer
2/15/04 The Santa Maria Public Airport
has become the first local agency to sign onto a team looking to sue the
federal government over strict rules protecting the California tiger
salamander.
General Manager Gary Rice said the airport board agreed to
join the effort spawned in Sonoma County in a legal maneuver to get the
salamander removed from the endangered species list.
Many public officials and private
citizens in Santa Barbara and Sonoma counties are angry that salamander
protection measures have interfered with development and farming, and they
contend the protections are based upon "junk science."
Santa Barbara
County's population of tiger salamanders was designated as endangered in 2000,
with similar protections issued for Sonoma County's salamanders last year.
However, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed reclassifying
salamanders in both counties as threatened, a lower designation than
endangered, and putting the same protections on all tiger salamanders in
Central California.
A Sonoma County consultant involved in mustering
salamander protection foes didn't return calls for comment on the lawsuit,
which is expected to be filed soon.
One of the highest-profile projects
stalled by the critter is the airport district's Santa Maria Research Park, a
combination of light industry and golf course that it is proposing to develop
near Blosser and Foster roads.
Although the board voted to join Sonoma
County efforts in special meeting Feb. 2, Rice said Thursday night that local
involvement remains stalled pending receipt of a final copy of the citizen
complaint letter seeking an end to salamander protections, a draft of the
lawsuit, and confirmation of a strategy to settle the issue out of
court.
Rice said the airport board put a limit on how much it will spend
for the Sonoma-led legal action, but declined to identify the amount, which he
contends is confidential for now.
If the city council decides to join
the effort, the decision would be discussed behind closed doors as allowed
under state law, she said.
Other northern Santa Barbara County
agricultural, business and development organizations reportedly are weighing
whether to join the Sonoma effort.
"Right now we're not taking part in
this suit," said Vic Tognazzini, an agribusinessman and Santa Barbara County
Farm Bureau member. "It has nothing to do with the merits of the case. We
certainly agree with them."
In a similar action, a Lompoc Valley-led
effort is trying to get the western snowy plover removed from endangered
species protection lists under a federal lawsuit filed recently.
Staff
writer Janene Scully can be reached at 739-2214 or by e-mail at
janscully@pulitzer.net.
Non-text portions of this message have
been
removed.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment
to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml