Senate ALERT PART I – Invasive Species in Transportation Bill

Friends,
Good Job! - by those who fax’ed opposition to “invasive” species
regulation in the House version of the Transportation Act (SAFETEA). You won, and it’s gone!

Unfortunately it’s gone to the conferees, where the bad language remains in the Senate version.
All, Please act now to kill it in conference this week.

Send 4 quick identical faxes to Sen. Inhofe with visible “cc” to your
Senators
1) Senator James Inhofe, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee 202-224-5167
2) Senator James Inhofe, at his own Senate Office, 202-228-0380
3) and 4) to your Senators

Here is a quick link to the fax numbers of your Senators:
http://www.theorator.com/senate.html

Here’s a sample fax:
************************************************************************
Dear Senator Inhofe:
Please remove from the SAFETEA Transportation Bill, S.1072, all
reference to “invasive species” and “native plants”, and delete Sec. 166
of Title I, Sub Chapter F, in its entirety.

Invasive species is major environmental legislation that needs debating
on its own merits, or lack of them. The issue is poorly defined as any
species that is nonnative and could cause harm. There are no
restrictions on the bureaucracy making the designation, no takings
protection for private land use. Without careful limits to regulatory
power, the potential for abuse is greater than that of the Endangered
Species Act.

Sincerely,
name, mailing address, email address
************************************************************************
Please do send the faxes. There are talking points below for writing
your own, but if you’re shy on time, just go ahead and use this one as
better than nothing.

Invasive Species is hot and heavy in the Senate. In a week we’re also sending
information on 2 more bills that need immediate comment. Sorry about the
barrage, but a little effort now can save big trouble later!

Best regards,

PS:
Talking Points:
·    Basic Issue: Implication that everything “nonnative” is “harmful”. Native poison ivy is more harmful to children than non-native fescue that is the major component of soccer fields.
·    Definition: No universally accepted definition of  “Could Cause Harm” and  no required objective review of  such determination. Credible scientists disagree. Already Western counties have eradicated weeds and been threatened by critical habitat protection under the Endangered Species Act for the identical plants.
·    Private Land: There is no takings compensation for restricting plants or animals on private property. Agency personnel are unrestrained in extending federal restrictions to private land.
·    Forestry: hybrid trees and GMO’s are nonnative. Regulators can say
they could cause harm to native ecosystems and proscribe their use on
private forests.  
·     Clean Water Act: In some states tall fescue, rye grasses and crownvetch are already forbidden on public land. How long would it take to restrict their use
for BMP’s?
·     Sportsmen: pheasants, boar and rainbow trout are nonnative. The
National Park Service already seeks their removal from the Smokies.
·     Gardeners: English ivy and Russian olive are listed as invasive
(harmful) in National Forests in the South.
·     Pets: German shepherds and French poodles are nonnative and meet the
definition of invasive in that they could bite.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further information please refer to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml