Nation's Most Endangered Wildlife
Refuges of 2004 Announced by Defenders of Wildlife
Corporate and Industrial Development Cited
as
Most Pervasive Threat to Refuges
WASHINGTON, Oct. 8
/PRNewswire/ -- Growing threats combined with seriously inadequate federal
funding and thin congressional support have thrown the
country's national
wildlife refuge system into a state of decline over the
last several years,
declared Defenders of Wildlife days before National
Wildlife Refuge Week
(October 10-16).
In a report released today, Defenders of
Wildlife provides one of the
first in-depth looks at how development, air
and water toxins, oil and gas
waste, farming, invasive species and other
threats are eroding the largest
system of protected lands in the world
dedicated to wildlife conservation.
Entitled, "Refuges at Risk," the report
names the nation's ten most endangered
wildlife refuges for
2004.
"Today, America's national wildlife refuge system
is facing an
environmental perfect storm," stated Rodger Schlickeisen,
President of
Defenders of Wildlife. "Its threats are larger in scope,
more difficult to
control, more damaging, and more costly than ever
before. On top of this is
weakening support for the Refuge system in
Congress and an administration that
doesn't seem to understand what the
American people want -- to protect these
places for wildlife. Just
look at the relentless push to drill the crown
jewel of the refuge system,
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge."
"In 1990, former
President Bush commissioned a blue ribbon panel that
determined that
accelerating loss of natural habitat and species, along with
global warming,
represent the most serious long-term threat to the welfare of
our children
and grandchildren," continued Schlickeisen. "These losses are
tearing
holes in the web of life that sustains us all. If we can't
protect
wildlife and habitat on our wildlife refuges, where can we protect
it?"
The national wildlife refuge system contains 540
refuges and covers nearly
100 million acres in all 50 states and 5
territories, providing some of this
nation's most spectacular landscapes and
supporting an amazing variety of
wildlife -- from migratory birds to bighorn
sheep, elk and caribou -- many of
them endangered. Close to 40 million
visitors come to refuges every year
seeking outdoor
experiences.
According to Defenders' report, the most
pervasive threat facing the
system today is escalating corporate and
industrial development inside and
close to refuges. For example, oil
and gas wells in the Delta refuge have
killed vegetation and polluted
marshland habitat, while the Bush
administration and many in Congress
attempt to permit drilling in the Arctic
refuge. Over 100 refuges
contain more than 4,400 oil and gas wells, including
more than 1,800 active
wells in 36 refuges. At the Desert refuge, a proposal
to drill for
water for Las Vegas may suck the area dry. Farming in and near
the
Klamath refuges is polluting habitat and diverting water. Noise, air
and
water pollution from a proposed jet landing field and a proposed egg
factory
near the Pocosin Lakes refuge threatens serious harm to
wildlife.
"The Interior Department has continually put
the needs of wildlife second
to corporate interests," said Jamie Rappaport
Clark, President Clinton's
Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and now Executive Vice
President at Defenders of Wildlife. "Imagine if
our national parks were
treated this way. It's time for us, as a
nation, to consider these places to
be as much a part of our national
heritage as the Grand Canyon and the Statue
of Liberty. Each refuge we
let deteriorate, each acre of habitat we destroy
only further damages the
conservation legacy we leave to future generations."
"Today every refuge is in a funding crisis," said Clark. The
refuge
system is operating at 50% below what it needs. Nearly 200
refuges do not
even have staff. A chronic problem, funding shortfalls
now total more than
$1.2 billion.
"In addition,
funding for federal land acquisition in the Land and Water
Conservation Fund
under this administration has experienced severe funding
declines," added
Clark.
"Next week is National Wildlife Refuge Week, a
time to celebrate this
nation's commitment to conserving the wealth of
natural resources on these
lands. Ironically, though, we're not doing
nearly enough to safeguard our
refuges," added Schlickeisen. "We
cannot sit by and watch the only public
lands devoted to wildlife protection
whither away. There's simply too much at
stake -- not only for us but
for future generations."
Defenders of Wildlife works with
federal, tribal, state, and local
agencies, private organizations, and
landowners to protect America's national
wildlife refuges. The goal of
the "Refuges at Risk" report, the first in a
series, is to spotlight the
threats facing the wildlife refuge system in order
to build public support
for saving wildlife by safeguarding and nourishing the
places where they
live.
2004 Ten Most Endangered Wildlife
Refuges (in alphabetical order)
Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge, AK: The Bush administration and the
majority leadership in
the House and Senate support industry requests to
drill. Drilling
would devastate the nation's largest wildlife refuge.
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, AZ: Border policies
have
deliberately funneled unprecedented and growing numbers of migrants
and
enforcement personnel into this fragile ecosystem with results both
tragic and
destructive for the refuge. The last home to the highly
endangered Sonoran
pronghorn, the refuge simply cannot withstand escalating
border activities.
Delta National Wildlife Refuge,
LA: Private oil and gas companies have
drilled wells, laid pipelines and
processing facilities, carved canals into
the refuges marshes, and spilled
oil and contaminated water throughout the
refuge. The refuge is one of
the most important wintering and staging areas
for migratory
birds.
Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, NV: A
pending proposal pushed by
the Southern Nevada Water Authority to drill
water wells in the refuge
threatens to dry up spring-fed desert oases
essential for endangered species.
Don Edwards San
Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, CA: Rapid suburban
development,
polluting run-off, invasive species threaten the nation's largest
urban
wildlife refuge. Without increased funding for habitat restoration
and
protection, literally most of the shorebirds on the West Coast are
in
jeopardy.
Klamath Basin National Wildlife
Refuges, OR, CA: Industrial farming
currently allowed on the Klamath refuges
uses massive amounts of the basin's
water, pollutes with pesticides, and
destroys wildlife habitat. With almost
all the birds in the Pacific
Flyway using these refuges, the Klamath refuges
should be dedicated to
wildlife habitat, not industrial agriculture.
Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge, ND: Coal-burning power plants in
North
Dakota and Canada have polluted the air and water of the refuge.
Today, the
refuge's air quality is so bad that it violates Clean Air Act
standards for
protected areas. Also, mercury levels in the refuge's
4,000 ponds are
extremely toxic.
Lower Rio Grand
National Wildlife Refuge, TX: Currently, the refuge is
comprised of
fragmented chunks of land that provide only tiny islands of
habitat in a sea
of agriculture and development. With support from the
Bush
administration, Congress has diverted funds previously set aside to
expand
protected areas, leaving this refuge -- that has more bird species
than any
other refuge - with little money to connect its
habitat.
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, NC:
A Navy landing field, from
which 100 sorties a day would be flown by fighter
jets at low altitudes, is
proposed for one mile from the refuge; and a
proposed million-chicken egg
factory near the refuge would foul the water
and threaten waterfowl with
disease.
Upper
Mississippi River National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, MN, WI, IL, IA:
Mercury
contamination, agricultural runoff, water pollution, habitat loss,
invasive
plant and animal species, and damaging Army Corps of Engineers
projects are
severely degrading this refuge, the longest in the
contiguous
U.S.