Big changes for Big Muddy

Todd Richmond,  Associated Press
May 19, 2005 REFUGE0519

MADISON, Wis. -- No booze on the beaches. Keep those Jet Skis off the backwaters. And no more blasting away at ducks all day.

Those are some of the potential changes for the upper Mississippi River as the federal government firms up a sweeping, $216 million-plus regulatory package. The plan could transform river life for the next decade and a half by limiting waterfowl hunting, camping and boating.

Federal officials say the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's plan is designed to reduce human stress on the fragile river environment and improve wild habitats.

"What we're striving for is balance. We want people to be able to use the refuge and enjoy the critters,'' said Jim Nissen, manager of Fish and Wildlife's district in La Crosse, Wis., which lies on the Mississippi.

But outdoors lovers are livid over changes to their traditional river hobbies. They say the agency is rushing the plan.

"This is big stuff. It really gouges a lot of folks,'' said Ron Nicklaus, 56, of Genoa, Wis., an avid duck hunter who camps every summer on the Mississippi. "It (the Mississippi) doesn't belong to the Fish and Wildlife Service. It belongs to the folks.''

The 600-page document would lay out new regulations through the year 2020 for about 240,000 acres of Mississippi floodplain designated as a national wildlife refuge.

The refuge stretches about 260 miles from southern Minnesota to northern Illinois. It's home to hundreds of species of plants, fish and birds, including bald eagles. More than 3 million people visit the refuge annually, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service.

The federal Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 requires refuges be managed according to their mission to restore fish, wildlife and plants. The act calls for every national refuge to have a plan by 2012, Nissen said.

Public hearings have been scheduled in Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois. Agency staff will tweak the document after the public comment period ends in August, and Fish and Wildlife regional director Robyn Thorson then will sign off on it, putting it into effect.

Among the agency's recommendations:

—Limit overnight camping to main channel islands and shorelines. Anyone with a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher would be banned from camping, and district managers would be allowed to declare beaches alcohol-free.

—Explore beach user fees, but the plan doesn't set any.

—Set up 16 areas encompassing nearly 14,500 mostly backwater acres where boaters could use nothing more powerful than electric motors and must obey a 5-mph speed limit.

—Increase the number of no-hunting zones from seven to 13, encompassing 5,322 acres. The number of zones where waterfowl hunting is banned would go from 15 to 21 — 790 acres larger than the current areas — in 2006. Hunters would be limited to 25 shells. Currently there are no limits on how much ammunition they can carry.

—New waterfowl sanctuaries would be added near McGregor, Iowa, Winona, Minn., and Savanna, Ill.

Nissen said refuge officials have struggled with huge parties and underage drinking on the river, particularly in the Winona area, and people have complained they can't get any peace and quiet, even in the backwaters.

"If you're fishing in a small flat and you've got Jet Skis buzzing all around you, so much for the solitude,'' Nissen said.

The hunting restrictions were added to minimize conflict between people using the river for different purposes, improve safety, help waterfowl find more safe breeding areas and fill gaps between current closed areas, according to the plan.

The ammunition limit would discourage "skybusting,'' the practice of shooting excessively at out-of-range birds, the plan said. Skybusting can result in crippled ducks that can't be retrieved, it said.

Bill Howe, 82, of Prairie du Chien, Wis., grew up on the Mississippi. He scoffed at the plan.

District managers shouldn't have the power to ban alcohol from beaches, he said. That's the purview of state and local governments, he said. He wondered how the agency would enforce such restrictions.

"Where do you go if you have a can of beer on your boat and you have problems and go to a beach to fix it?'' Howe asked. "It isn't a document that considers people.''

U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis., a duck hunter with a house on the Mississippi, said he couldn't support a plan that restricts so much river access. Enforcement would be nearly impossible, he said.

"That's the problem with the plan. You can't enforce it unless you hire 100 or 200 agents,'' Kind said.

He said he's still meeting with Fish and Wildlife personnel, but he might fight to withhold funding if the plan isn't revised.

The Wisconsin Conservation Congress, a statewide group of sportsmen, plans to write a letter to Fish and Wildlife asking the agency to extend the public comment period to six months.

———

On the Net:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/uppermiss/index.html#DraftEIS


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further information please refer to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml