By Tom DeWeese
We’ve all seen the bumper
stickers, “Think Globally – Act Locally.” It’s a creation
of those who seek to impose international guidelines, rules and regulations on
how we all live. Americans are about to find that it’s not just an empty
slogan.
From June 1 through 5, 2005, the city of San Francisco was the
site of an international conference called “World Environment Day.”
But the agenda of this conference was much bigger than just another hippy dance
in the park. This meeting of the global elite had a specific target and an
agenda with teeth. The goal was the full implementation of the UN’s Agenda
21 policy called Sustainable Development, a ruling principle for top-down
control of every aspect of our lives – from food, to health care, to
community development, and beyond. This time, the target audience is our
nation’s mayors. The UN’s new tactic, on full display at this
conference, is to ignore federal and state governments and go straight to the
roots of American society. Think globally – act locally.
As part
of their participation in the conference, mayors were pressed to commit their
communities to specific legislative and policy goals by signing a slate of
United Nations accords. Two documents were presented for the mayors’
signature.
The first document is called the “Green Cities
Declaration,” a statement of principles which set the agenda for the
mayors’ assigned task. It says, in part, “Believing as Mayors of
cities around the globe, we have a unique opportunity to provide leadership to
develop truly sustainable urban centers based on culturally and economically
appropriate local actions ” The Declaration is amazingly bold in that it
details exactly how the UN intends to implement a very specific agenda in every
town and city in the nation. The document includes lots of rhetoric about the
need to curtail greenhouse gases and preserve resources. But the final line of
the Green Cities Declaration was the point of the whole affair: “Signatory
cities shall work to implement the following Urban Environment Accords. Each
year cities shall pick three actions to adopt as policies or laws.”
The raw meat of the agenda is outlined in detail in the second
document, called the “Urban Environment Accords.” The Accords include
exactly 21 specific actions (as in Agenda 21) for the mayors to take,
controlled by a time table for implementation. Here’s a quick look at a
few of the 21 agenda actions called for. Under the topic of energy, action item
number one calls for mayors to implement a policy to increase the use of
“renewable” energy by 10% within seven years. Renewable energy
includes solar and wind power.
Not stated in the UN documents is the
fact that in order to meet the goal, a community would have to reserve
thousands of acres of land to set up expensive solar panels or even more land
for wind mills. Consider that it takes a current 50 megawatt gas-fired
generating plant about 2-5 acres of land to produce its power. Yet to create
that same amount of power through the use of solar panels would require at
least 1,000 acres. Using wind mills to generate 50 megawatts would require over
4,000 acres of land, while chopping up birds and creating a deafening roar. The
cost of such “alternative” energy to the community would be vastly
prohibitive. Yet, such unworkable ideas are the environmentally-correct orders
of the days that the mayors are being urged to follow.
Energy Actions
two and three deal with the issue of reducing energy consumption. Both of these
are backdoor sneak attacks by the UN to enforce the discredited Kyoto Global
Warming Treaty, which President Bush has refused to implement. Kyoto would
force the United States to reduce its energy consumption by at least 30
percent, forcing energy shortages and severely damaging the nation’s
economy. Kyoto is the centerpiece of the UN’s drive to control the world
economy and redistribute wealth to Third World nations. It would do nothing to
help the environment. Yet, the mayors are being pushed to help implement this
destructive treaty city-by-city.
Perhaps the most egregious action
offered in the Urban Environmental Accords deals with the topic of water.
Action number twenty calls for adoption and implementation of a policy to
reduce individual water consumption by 10% by 2020. Interestingly, UN begins by
stating: “Cities with potable water consumption greater than 100 liters
per capita per day will adopt and implement policies to reduce consumption by
10 percent by 2015.” There is no basis for the 100 liter figure other than
employing a very clever use of numbers to lower the bar and control the debate.
One must be aware that 100 liters equals about 26 gallons per person, per day.
According to the UN, each person should only have 10% less than 26
gallons each day to drink, bathe, flush toilets, wash clothes, water lawns,
wash dishes, cook, and more. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, Americans
need about 100 GALLONS per day to perform these basic functions. Consider also
that there is no specific water shortage in the United States. According to the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, annual water withdrawal across the nation
is about 407 billion gallons, while consumption (including evaporation and
plant use, is about 94 billion gallons. Such restrictions, as outlined in the
Urban Environment Accords, are really nothing more than a major campaign by the
UN to control water consumption. Yet the nation’s mayors are being pushed
to impose policies to take away our free use of water. The rest of the Accords
deal with a variety of subjects including waste reduction, recycling,
transportation, health, and nature. Perhaps the most blatant promise of action
is Action number sixteen in which the mayors are supposed to agree to:
“Every year identify three products, chemicals, or compounds that are used
within your city that represents the greatest risk to human health and adopt a
law to eliminate their sale and use in the city.”
There you have
it. Every year, our nation’s mayors are to promise to ban something! What
if there isn’t a “chemical or compound” that poses a risk? Gotta
ban something anyway. That’s not an idle threat. In the 1990’s
Anchorage, Alaska had some of the most pristine water in the nation. It had no
pollution. Yet the federal government ordered the city to meet strict federal
clean water standards that required it to remove a certain percentage of
pollution. In order to meet those requirements, Anchorage was forced to dump
fish parts into its pristine water so that it could then clean out the required
quotas. Your city’s mayor may have to ban the ink in your fountain pen to
meet his quota – and ban it he will. And what is the mayor’s reward
for destroying private property rights, increasing energy costs on less
consumption, and banning something useful every year? He gets green stars.
That’s right. According to UN documents, if your mayor can complete 8-11
of the prescribed 21 actions, the town will get a green star and the
designation, “Local Sustainable City.” 12-17 actions completed will
garner two green stars and the designation, “National Sustainable
City.” 15-18 actions completed will bring in three green stars and the
title “Regional Sustainable City.” Finally, the energizer bunny mayor
who gets 19-21 actions completed will get a full four green stars and the
ultimate designation of “Global Sustainable City.” Certainly he or
she will also get a plaque and get to sit at the head table at the next UN
Sustainable Development conference. In the San Francisco summit, the mayors
were wooed by the elite, from UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to Maurice
Strong, to Senator Diane Feinstein, to Hollywood activists Robert Redford and
Martin Sheen, to chimp-master Jane Goodall. All the usual suspects were there
to press the flesh and push the agenda. Businesses like Mitsubishi, which hope
to make huge profits from green industry by using such policy to destroy
competition, helped pay for the event. The news media was well represented too,
not in a journalistic role to report the news, but as full-fledged sponsors
helping to spread their own brand of propaganda. All understood that a new
governing elite, elected by no one, answerable to their own set of standards,
is being created for the care and feeding of us all. With the right contacts
and the proper show of public spirit, there are riches and power to be created.
Even for your local mayor.
Sustainable Development is truly stunning in
its magnitude to transform the world into feudal-like governance by making
nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society. It is a
scheme fueled by unsound science and discredited economics that can only lead
modern society down the road to a new dark ages. It is a policy of banning
goods and regulating and controlling human action. It is systematically
implemented through the creation of non-elected visioning boards and planning
commissions. There is no place in the Sustainable world for individual thought,
private property or free enterprise. It is the exact opposite of the free
society envisioned by this nation’s founders. Even before the San
Francisco conference, the UN’s influence over the nation’s mayors has
been felt as 132 U.S. mayors have moved to implement the Kyoto Treaty in
defiance of the Bush Administration’s rejection of it. Moreover, the
treaty is the centerpiece of the agenda for the national meeting of the U.S.
Conference of Mayors, slated for Chicago just one week after the San Francisco
meeting. Think globally and act locally is no longer just a slogan on the back
of a Volvo. It’s a well entrenched national policy bleeding down into your
local community, carried there by Judas goats who have been elected by you.
America’s mayors are the elected representatives closest to the people.
They are the ones that our founders intended to have the most influence over
our daily lives. If the UN succeeds in its efforts to enforce Sustainable
Development policy through our mayors, the process will accelerate at an
astounding rate and locally-controlled government will cease to exist. But
signs, adorned with green stars, will certainly greet us at every city limit
line as the inhabitants, stripped of their property rights; buried under huge
tax burdens; struggling under reduced energy flow, shuffle on as their proud
mayor gleams in the global limelight under the banner “think globally and
act locally.”
Tom DeWeese is the publisher/editor of The DeWeese
Report and president of the American Policy Center, an activist think tank
headquartered in Warrenton, VA. The Center maintains a website at
www.americanpolicy.org. © Tom DeWeese 2005
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |