Liberty Matters News Service

April 22, 2005
 

468 Tons of Dirt Moved by Hand

Officials of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) have come to an agreement regarding the presence of the so-called endangered fairy shrimp on the airport's property. The shrimp were discovered at LAX in 1998, and ever since FWS has tried to force airport officials to maintain water in the area as critical habitat for the tiny one-half to one inch creatures. But the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules require water or vegetation that might attract birds be removed from airport premises. "Because of the concerns for passenger safety, the FAA does not want standing water in that area, so the shrimp had not been able to complete their life cycle," said Jane Hendron, a FWS spokeswoman. (The little shrimp cysts hatch in mud puddles after a rain). As a result, the FWS agreed to allow Los Angeles City to move the critters to either Torrance or the closed El Toro Marine Corps Air Station in Orange County where a preserve must by created for them at city expense. Airport officials will begin moving the things as soon as the puddles dry, hopefully by September. The area in question is about 1.3 acres in size and contains about 468 tons of dirt and will have to be collected using hand trowels. Only the government using the hammer of the Endangered Species Act could have created such a ridiculous waste of time, money and resources.
City to Move Endangered Shrimp

Trying to Clean Up Their Act

In a move to avoid losing their cushy tax exempt status, The Land Trust Alliance announced it is launching a $3 million program to improve the image of America's 1,500 land trust organizations. Following the now-famous Washington Post exposé of the questionable deals concocted by The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Congress began to look into whether TNC and the other land trusts were following proper IRS procedures. A report by the Joint Committee on Taxation, subsequently recommended removing tax breaks for conservation easements and historic facade easements, a move that has the land trusts a bit concerned. Recently, IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson reported to the Senate Finance Committee that the IRS has found problems with virtually every type of land-use, tax-exempt organization and is conducting an extensive audit of the Nature Conservancy. "We are currently examining 48 easement donors and also are reviewing deductions taken for nearly 400 open space easements to be followed with a review of over 700 facade easements. We will use all civil and criminal tools at our disposal to combat abuses," Everson said.
Alliance Starts Plan to Improve Land Trusts

Wal-Mart Buckles to Extortion

Bowing to criticism from the greens regarding its contributing role to "urban sprawl" and its evil twin capitalism, Wal-Mart has agreed to partner with and pay the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to take more private property off the market. The giant retail firm has pledged to provide $35 million over the next ten years to buy at least 138,000 acres of land, equal to the amount of land occupied by all of its stores and other facilities. Interior Secretary praised the move during a ceremony at the infamous invasive species/global warming advocate National Geographic Society on Tuesday. "'Acres for America' demonstrates the power of cooperative conservation and partnership," Norton said. "[Wal-Mart] is setting a standard of corporate stewardship that I hope other companies will emulate." Acreage acquired under the program already exceeds the target as the Foundation has agreed to purchase 6,000 acres to expand the Catahoula National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana and a permanent conservation easement on more than 312,000 acres in Maine. Other projects for "Acres for America" include: acquisition of two ranches encompassing 850,000 acres on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon; 1,226 acres of habitat for the "endangered" Indiana bat in Arkansas; and a 1,120 acre conservation easement on a ranch in Oregon.
Wal-Mart, NFWF Partner for Conservation

Let Them Eat Cake

The consequences of making laws dictating where and if people can build their homes is becoming painfully clear in California. Most of the county of San Mateo is off-limits to home building and the existing homes continue to rise in value, as much as $2,000 a day. The average cost of a single-family home in the county, last month reached $896,000, way out of reach for the average family. As a result, young people are leaving the area in droves and schools are closing for lack of students. Dr. Thomas Sowell writes that rich people trying to find a purpose for their existence have pushed for legislation to prevent their surroundings from being gobbled up by "sprawl" in the name of protecting the environment. Now the poor, the children, and minorities the "limousine liberals" claim to care about are being driven into the interior valleys far from their work places. "The same wealthy busybodies" are pursuing them into the interior valleys, "where environmental foundations and movements are trying to get the same housing restrictions imposed." Dr. Sowell says, "[P]olitically, this selfishness poses as idealism... These are green activists buying an artificial significance for themselves that they would never have had as mere inheritors of fortunes earned by others."
Easy Money in California

Home

Send mail to the webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2001 Liberty Matters