January 25, 2006
Humble Church Is at Center of Debate on Eminent Domain
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL
SAND SPRINGS, Okla., Jan. 23 - With bulldozers churning up
the earth at the front door, the small Centennial Baptist Church in this
struggling industrial hub west of Tulsa seems about to fall to the wrecker.
But the construction is just roadwork, for now. And that is
all it will ever be if the congregation has its way.
"The Lord didn't send me here to build a minimall," said the
longtime pastor, the Rev. Roosevelt Gildon.
In what a local newspaper called "a battle between God
Almighty and the almighty dollar," Sand Springs is moving ahead with a
redevelopment plan to clear the church and other occupants from the rundown
district near downtown to make way for superstores like the Home Depot.
"I'm open to anyone telling me how we're going to pay for
city services," said Mayor Bob Walker, who said the city was seeking to
negotiate fair prices with Mr. Gildon and other property owners - 41 offers
have been accepted - and would use eminent domain only as a last resort.
Strengthened by a United States Supreme Court ruling last
summer that approved the condemnation of private property by New London, Conn.,
for resale to other private interests for what the court called "public
purpose," municipalities around the country are considering similar forced
takings, to a chorus of opposition by local interests and state legislators.
Bills to block such seizures are on the docket in Oklahoma
and many other states, along with other ballot initiatives. Last summer, the
Texas Legislature banned the taking of private property for more lucrative
public ventures.
Here in Sand Springs, a city of 17,600 on the Arkansas River
founded by Charles Page, the oilman, industrialist and philanthropist, the
redevelopment plan dates from 2003. County voters agreed to add fractions of a
penny to the sales tax for special projects, in the Sand Springs case $14.5
million to acquire private tracts on 96 acres along the highway for
redevelopment.
But the project was thrust into the national spotlight on
Jan. 17 with an article posted on National Review Online by a conservative
group, Americans for Limited Government, based in Glenview, Ill., that has been
working with Oklahomans in Action and other groups to gather signatures for the
"Protect Our Homes" movement and budget-curbing measures on state ballots.
"It's not just grandma's house we have to worry about,"
wrote Heather Wilhelm, communications director for the limited government
group. "Now it's God's house, too."
The Sand Springs Leader stepped up coverage of Mr. Gildon,
and a local radio host, Dillon Dodge, broadcast a program on the dispute.
"Hannity and Colmes," the talk show on the Fox News Channel, plans a program
from Sand Springs on Wednesday, Ms. Wilhelm said.
City officials, mortified at being portrayed as villains,
protested that they had not seized any property and might not. "Eminent domain
is not being used at this time to acquire property," City Manager Loy Calhoun
said in a statement Friday. "Media reports to the contrary are inaccurate."
But in interviews, Mr. Calhoun and Mayor Walker acknowledged
that it remained a last resort if the city and property owners could not agree
on price.
Mr. Gildon, sitting in a pew of the church that he has led
for 14 years, the last seven in a new building that cost $90,000, said he and
other leaders of the congregation met last week with a relocation agent working
for the city, the Cinnabar Service Company, and came away believing that they
had little choice but to sell.
"If you tell me this is going to happen," he said, "that
tells me it's eminent domain."
He said the offer of $142,000 for the church and two extra
lots was not enough to move to a new location where he could serve his 50 or so
regular members. He said he was "praying over" the question of a counteroffer.
"If I have to move," he said, "we're not going out of existence."
Mr. Gildon, 48, who works full time for a machine tool
manufacturer and is paid $520 a month by the church, said he was not leading a
crusade on the issue and made a point of not bringing it up it up in his
sermons.
"I've had to say, 'Don't let it go to your head,' " he said
he told congregants. "We're not celebrities. We're here for God."
But he said he was no pushover, either. He taped the meeting
with the Cinnabar agent, John Thomas, and said he told city officials, "The
Lord did not lead me here to sell out the church."
If the parties cannot agree, a team of three appointed
appraisers devises a final offer, and whether or not the seller is happy, the
city can take it for that price - and sell it to someone else.
Other property owners in the first 25-acre redevelopment
zone said they felt that the city's initial offer of $1 a square foot was far
too low. A fairer figure, several said, would be $8.50.
"I don't have a problem with the city," said Joe Harrison,
who runs the Firestone dealership downtown. "I just don't want them stealing my
land."
In the Muffler Stop a few blocks from the church, Ernie
Nanney said the city first offered him $65,000 "which is less than I paid 25
years ago." He said that he counteroffered $350,000 and that the city came back
with $85,000.
In her small wood-frame house on Oak Street, Ray Jean
Smith-Knight, 72, said that when she grew up a few houses away the neighborhood
was "a little old Wall Street" of black professionals, and survivors of the
Tulsa race riot of 1921 were welcomed to Sand Springs by Charles Page.
Ms. Smith-Knight said that she had yet to receive a buyout
offer and that despite the deterioration of the area did not relish leaving.
"I'm not happy about it but I don't have a choice," she
said. "So many people have passed away that used to be fighters. One or two
cannot fight."
Ruth Ellen Henry, founding director of the Sand Springs
Cultural and Historical Museum, recalled a cleanup of the neighborhood a dozen
years ago that removed a million pounds of debris but failed to halt its slide.
She still has many friends there, she said, "but you can't say they tore down
paradise and built a parking lot."
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |