Compromise Proposed in
Eminent Domain Fight
Tue Feb
7, 10:53 AM ET
The mayor of New London, where a fight over government
seizing property led to a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling, is proposing
a compromise for a group of homeowners.
Under a plan presented to the City Council Monday night,
four people whose homes were seized for a private development would be allowed
to stay. The city would own their properties and the residents would have to
pay the city to live there.
Two other homeowners were excluded from Mayor Beth Sabilia's
plan; one doesn't live in the home and the other moved in after the court
battle began.
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in June that the quasi-public
New London Development Corp. could take homes in the Fort Trumbull area for
private economic development. The 94-acre project, proposed in 1998, calls for
a hotel, office space and upscale housing.
The court also said states are free to ban the taking of
property under eminent domain for such projects, and many states have begun
considering such bans.
One of the property owners who sued over the Fort Trumbull
seizures, Susette Kelo, said the mayor's proposal shows that the houses and the
private development can coexist. But she and another plaintiff, Michael
Cristofaro, said they aren't interested in paying rent for homes they owned.
"The ongoing battle of the last eight years has not been to
allow us to live in our homes and pay rent to the city of New London until we
die," Kelo said.
The city council voted Monday to collect rent from the
homeowners while city Law Director Thomas Londregan studies the mayor's
proposal.
Michael Joplin, president of the New London Development
Corp., said the agency would defer to the council's decision.
The government offered what it said was fair value for the
Fort Trumbull homes. Most residents took the money and left, but those
remaining either say the money isn't enough or their homes aren't for sale at
all. Money for the houses still standing has been set aside for the homeowners.
Copyright
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
|
Copyright
© 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
[Non-text portions of
this message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without
profit or payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |
|