For
Release: February 27, 2006 Contact: Peyton Knight at (202)
543-4110 or pknight@nationalcenter.org
Protect
Private Property Rights, 85 Groups Tell Senate, in Endangered Species Act
Reform
Signatories Include Two Former Reagan
Administration Cabinet Officials
Washington, D.C., Feb.
27 - Today, a letter signed by 85 major national and state policy
organizations was delivered to Senators on the Environment and Public Works
Committee. The letter warns Senators that any Endangered Species Act reform
effort must include strong private property rights protections. The coalition
letter was spearheaded by The National Center for Public Policy Research.
"Whatever action the Senate takes on ESA reform should reflect the
national, bipartisan outcry for strong property rights protections," said David
Ridenour, vice president of The National Center for Public Policy Research.
"Quite simply, when the government takes your property, the least it can do is
pay for it."
National policy organizations signing the letter include:
Coalitions for America, the American Conservative Union, the National Taxpayers
Union, Eagle Forum, the National Center for Policy Analysis, the 60 Plus
Association, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Property Rights
Foundation of America, the National Legal and Policy Center, and the American
Family Association, among many others.
The letter was also signed by
the Honorable Edwin Meese III, who served as U.S. Attorney General under
President Ronald Reagan, and the Honorable Don Hodel, who served as both U.S.
Secretary of Interior and Secretary of Energy in the Reagan Administration.
Former Senator Malcolm Wallop (R-WY) signed the letter as well.
State
policy groups, including the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, Oregonians in
Action, the James Madison Institute, the Illinois Policy Institute, and the
Virginia Institute for Public Policy, among others, also signed the letter.
"Today, private landowners live in fear of the ESA. Those who harbor
endangered species on their property or merely own land suitable for such
species can find themselves subject to severe land use restrictions that can be
financially devastating," said Ridenour. "This creates a perverse incentive for
landowners to preemptively 'sterilize' their land to keep rare species away.
Such sterilizations benefit no one - least of all the species the ESA was
established to protect."
"Property owners should not be punished for
being good environmental stewards, yet that is exactly what the ESA does," said
Peyton Knight, director of environmental and regulatory affairs for The
National Center.
In order to fix the ESA's perverse incentive problem,
the letter says property owners who are denied the use of their land should be
given 100 percent, fair market value compensation for losses. This would bring
the ESA in line with the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which
guarantees such compensation ("nor shall private property be taken for public
use, without just compensation").
"Americans nationwide were outraged
when, in Kelo v. City of New London, the Supreme Court ruled that government
could evict property owners to financially benefit private interests," said
Knight. "As terrible as eminent domain abuse is, at least the victims in
eminent domain cases are compensated. Landowners who lose their property under
the Endangered Species Act don't receive a dime."
Under the current
ESA, landowners who apply to the Department of Interior for permission to use
their property are often forced to wait years for a response - years during
which they often are unable to use the land they legally own, and on which they
pay taxes.
The letter suggests that establishing a simple time limit
within which the Department of Interior must issue final decisions to
landowners' requests could prevent this injustice.
Meaningful ESA
reform faces a big hurdle in the Senate, as the chairman of the subcommittee
with jurisdiction over the Act is liberal Senator Lincoln Chafee (R-RI).
The National Center tried to schedule a meeting to discuss upcoming
reform efforts with Senator Chafee's staff. However, the prospect of a meeting
was immediately rebuffed by the Senator's staff after The National Center made
it clear it wished to discuss the importance of protecting property rights in
such a meeting.
"Allergy season is just around the corner and 'property
rights' are apparently ragweed to the Chafee office," said Knight.
"Unfortunately, this strangest of allergies hurts American property owners and
endangered species more than it does the Senator and his staff."
A PDF
copy of the letter can be obtained online at
www.nationalcenter.org/ESAPropertyRights022706.pdf.
The
National Center for Public Policy Research is a conservative, free-market
think-tank established in 1982 and located on Capitol Hill. For more
information, contact Peyton Knight at (202) 543-4110, email
pknight@nationalcenter.org or
visit the National Center's website at
www.nationalcenter.org.
| The
National Center for Public Policy Research 501 Capitol Court,
N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002 (202) 543-4110 Fax (202)
543-5975 E-Mail: info@nationalcenter.org Web:
www.nationalcenter.org
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |