Make a Farm a Superfund Site?
By: Steven Milloy, Published Thursday, June 01, 2006
Environmental activists are teaming up with state attorneys
general and trial lawyers to bankrupt the nation's livestock farmers - in the
name of saving the environment.
If the situation wasn't so serious, it would be hilarious.
The activists - including the Natural Resources Defense
Council, Sierra Club, and Union of Concerned Scientists - are trying to
convince Congress that the nation's farms should be treated as industrial waste
sites and therefore subject to severe penalties under the federal Superfund
law. Some state attorneys general, supported by trial lawyers, have filed
lawsuits toward the same end.
Why? Because, they argue, animal manure is a hazardous
substance.
They are now demanding that Congress refuse to clarify that
the Superfund law was never intended to apply to natural animal waste. They are
claiming - falsely - that without Superfund, animal waste would be unregulated.
The fact is that manure already is heavily regulated under
the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and other federal and state regulations.
They are claiming - falsely - that small family farms won't be affected. The
reality is that under Superfund, huge penalties can be levied against small
operations and even individuals. Tens of thousands of small family farmers
could be affected.
Congress never intended the Superfund law to apply to the
nation's farms
- it was designed to clean up industrial waste sites like
Love Canal. But because it did not specifically exempt animal waste, activists
are now seizing on this lack of clarity to haul farmers before the courts and
apply the draconian penalties permissible under Superfund.
If the activists are successful, farmers could face
penalties of many millions of dollars and thousands of small farmers could be
forced off their land.
"The domestic livestock industry would be driven from this
country, the grain industry would be crippled, and farm families and
communities would be devastated," Oklahoma Farm Bureau chief Steve Kouplen
warned Congress last November.
"If animal manure is found to be a hazardous substance under
Superfund, then virtually every farm or ranch in the United States could be
written off as a toxic Superfund site," says Missouri cattleman Mike John, who
is also president of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association.
The activists' efforts are a deliberate distortion of the
law, devised by some local authorities and a small army of trial lawyers
seeking large settlements in which they - and the activist groups - would be
the chief beneficiaries.
"It's simply a shake-down," one dairy farmer told Congress.
"It would be a mockery of congressional intent," commented
Bob Stallman, head of the American Farm Bureau Federation. He notes that farms
and ranches that raise livestock are already among the most regulated business
sectors for environmental quality, subject to extensive federal and state laws
and regulations.
Farmers are by their nature pro-environment. Healthy crops
and livestock depend on a healthy environment. None of this apparently matters
to the activists, who may also see manure as a means to gain political sway
over farmers.
Given that federal and state environmental regulators are
often sympathetic to, if not in outright league with, environmental activists,
and that the Superfund law provides regulators with much discretion as to how
to identify and manage sites to be cleaned up, treating farms as Superfund
sites would essentially provide activists a powerful political weapon to be
used against farmers at the activists' discretion. Farmers who don't toe the
environmentalist line may find their farms declared as Superfund sites.
Congress inadvertently caused this problem in the first
place by not exempting animal manure from the original Superfund law. But who
could imagine that such an exemption would be necessary?
The good news is that Congress can quickly solve the problem
by passing a simple amendment to the Superfund law, clarifying that farm manure
is not considered a hazardous substance under the Act. A bipartisan bill to
this effect has already been introduced in the House with nearly 160
co-sponsors. A companion bill with bipartisan support is about to be introduced
in the Senate.
Congress needs to get this done soon for the sake of this
country's farmers, consumers - who would face escalating food prices and
shortages
- and just plain common sense. Cattleman Mike John says,
"It's just plain insulting to suggest naturally occurring manure on our family
farm deems us a Superfund site."
Manure, it seems, is the appropriate word for this latest
activist initiative.
Steven Milloy publishes JunkScience.com, CSRWatch.com. He is
a junk science expert, an advocate of free enterprise and an adjunct scholar at
the Competitive Enterprise Institute .
Source: http://www.FOXNEWS.COM
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |