March madness over tolls grips Legislature
Vexed by private tollway deals, affronted by TxDOT's attitudes,
Legislature looks to rein in Perry's turnpike push
By Ben Wear
<http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/03/19/mail
to:bwear@statesman.com>
AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Monday, March 19, 2007
Mike Krusee looked tired.
The Republican state representative from Williamson County, interviewed
at his Capitol office last week, for 10 days or so had been fighting what some
people call the creeping crud, a debilitating mixture of cold, flu and allergy
symptoms hitting many Central Texans this spring.
But Krusee, for much longer than 10 days, has also been fighting the
creeping realization among legislators that over the past two sessions, they
might have granted Gov. Rick Perry and the Texas Department of Transportation
too much power to create toll roads. For the first time in his three sessions
as chairman of the House Transportation Committee and the leading legislative
architect of toll road policy, Krusee is having to play defense.
For a number of reasons - campaign trail grumbling last year, disputes
with Dallas and Houston toll road agencies, lack of deference to legislators by
Texas transportation commissioners, turf battles over huge pots of money
suddenly coming Texas' way the Legislature has been gripped by a sort of March
madness over tollways, particularly those that would be in private hands for a
half-century.
What remains to be seen is what the madness will lead to by the end of
the session May 28. As transportation chairman, Krusee can, in theory, block
most legislation seeking to roll back tollway powers. And Perry could veto
whatever makes it to his desk.
But more than two-thirds of the Legislature has signed on to legislation
that would put a two-year moratorium on concessions, contracts with private
companies to build and run toll roads. Dozens of other bills limiting tollway
powers have been filed. And powerful legislators, including Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, are talking about using the power of
the purse to curb the Transportation Department.
Perry and Krusee may have no choice but to make concessions on
concessions and on other prongs of their toll road agenda.
"Watch the budget," Ogden said. "At the end of the day, TxDOT can't
spend a dime without our permission. So, watch the budget."
Ogden has a unique role in the situation.
In 2003, when he was chairman of the Senate Transportation and Homeland
Security Committee, Ogden sponsored House Bill 3588, a humongous bill that,
among other things, authorized Perry's Trans-Texas Corridor plan and allowed
the state to enter into concession agreements with private companies. That
bill, conceived and carried by Krusee in the House, basically made possible
everything that Ogden and most of the Legislature are now stewing over.
Ogden has filed bills that would prohibit the granting of long-term road
leases and require that toll roads become free roads when money borrowed by
government for construction is paid off. He says tolls should be a mechanism to
get a specific road built,
not a profit center. Those two short and simple measures would gut the
Transportation Department's toll road policy.
Ogden was asked for his take on why he and so many other lawmakers have
had second thoughts about their 2003 handiwork.
"What's going on? We had an election, that's what," Ogden said. "All
we're doing is reflecting what we heard on the campaign trail."
Others paint a more complicated picture. Repercussions from HB 3588 were
already being felt when the Legislature met in 2005. There was grass-roots toll
opposition in Austin and San Antonio and widespread unhappiness among farmers
and ranchers about the corridor plan to build 4,000 miles of tollways,
railroads and utility easements. But although the Legislature made some tweaks
in 2005, mostly to appease the rural concerns, nothing like this session's
Category 5 blowback occurred.
It's one thing to upset residents of Austin or Fayetteville and quite
another to get crosswise with toll road agencies in Dallas and Houston.
The Transportation Department, in its zeal to award long-term toll road
leases to private companies and thus reap multibillion-dollar upfront payments
from them, has managed to alienate the North Texas Tollway Authority and the
Harris County Toll Road Authority.
The local authorities want first shot at operating toll roads in their
areas and feel that the state agency has shouldered them out of the way.
On Feb. 27, the Transportation Department awarded a contract for Texas
121, a road in suburban Collin County north of Dallas, to a partnership headed
by Cintra, a Spanish toll road company that earlier won a bid to build 41 miles
of the Texas 130 tollway southeast of Austin with Texas partner Zachry
Construction. Cintra said it could give the state $2.1 billion upfront and $750
million more over 50 years for Texas 121.
The North Texas Tollway Authority declined to bid on that contract, a
choice that, depending on who is telling the tale, may or may not have been
made under pressure from Texas Transportation Commission Chairman Ric
Williamson and his department.
In Houston, the Transportation Department said in April that it wanted
more than $1.2 billion to sell some right of way to the Harris County authority
for three more toll roads. That huge price reflected not the real estate value,
but what the state could
get from a private tollway operator.
Those kinds of huge upfront payments from private road operators excite
Williamson and other tollanistas. But they come with a probable consequence to
consumers - higher tolls - and stoke fear that the state is underselling the
farm to tollway companies.
And legislators are made nervous by the Transportation Department's
newfound ability to generate towering wads of cash independent of the state
budget.
The Dallas and Houston episodes, along with Williamson's sometimes
off-putting certitude about toll roads, have earned the Transportation
Department some vigorous enemies in the statehouse, most prominently state Sen.
John Carona, R-Dallas. Carona, chairman of the Senate transportation committee,
has used that pulpit to bash Williamson and the agency. He also has a thick
packet of tollway rollback legislation pending.
Then there is freshman Sen. Robert Nichols, R-Jacksonville, a former
transportation commissioner and Williamson ally who is unhappy about language
in the pending Texas 130 contract that he says would either tie the state's
hands from building free roads near Cintra's section of Texas 130 or force the
state to pay Cintra-Zachry tens of millions of dollars in the future. He has
filed a Senate bill, with 24 co-sponsors, for a two-year moratorium on private
toll road contracts.
State Rep. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, has a House twin that has 97
co-sponsors.
Those freeze bills, and most of the other toll road bills, may never
move, however. This month, Carona has met in private at least three times with
Krusee, Williamson and Perry transportation aide Kris Heckmann with the
intention of creating an omnibus transportation bill to include elements from
the pending bills as well as policy changes sought by the Transportation
Department.
"It's important that we take these ideas now and wrap them into some
piece of policy that is balanced and makes the most long-term sense," Carona
said. "In all fairness, the Legislature has not left the commission with many
options other than the pursuit of toll roads."
Which brings up the gas tax. At 20 cents a gallon and holding since
1991, the tax is falling far short of meeting the state's need for new
pavement. Carona and Krusee have separate bills to make automatic annual
increases to the tax, based on different measures of inflation. Initially,
Carona's bill might increase the tax 3 cents a year and raise about $300
million more a year. Krusee's bill might generate a sixth of Carona's.
Neither will come close to eliminating the need for new toll roads.
Perry spokesman Robert Black said the governor, who has steadily opposed
gas taxes, "is not going to close the door" on a gas tax indexing bill. Black
suggested that if lawmakers take away some powers, "they need to replace them
with something. . . . If the Legislature wants to make changes, additions,
amendments, that's fine. But let's make sure it pushes forward."
bwear@statesman.com ; 445-3698
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |