|
Appeals court upholds ruling stopping logging in Ore.
case
By JEFF
BARNARD Associated Press
Writer
GRANTS
PASS, Ore. (AP) - Bush administration efforts to boost salvage logging after
wildfires suffered a loss Tuesday when a federal appeals court upheld a ruling
that had stopped harvest of burned trees in an old-growth forest reserve on
federal lands in southern Oregon.
The 2-1 ruling by a three-judge panel
of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling by U.S. District Judge
Ann Aiken in Eugene that stopped the U.S. Bureau of Land Management from
logging 23.4 million board feet of timber from 961 acres burned by the Timbered
Rock fire outside Medford in 2002.
The appeals court found that BLM's
plan to harvest dead and dying trees violated its own management plans and a
mandate to maintain and preserve old-growth forest ecosystems, including trees
killed by fire, under the Northwest Forest Plan, which was adopted in 1994 to
protect habitat for northern spotted owls, salmon and other species.
The
court also found that BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act by
failing to adequately analyze the cumulative environmental damage from scraping
33 miles of fire line and dropping 40,000 gallons of chemical retardant on the
area to put out the fire, and the harvest of 6,000 acres of dead trees on
neighboring private timberlands owned by Boise Corp.
In a similar case
on the 2002 Biscuit fire outside Grants Pass, a different federal judge upheld
a U.S. Forest Service plan that involved salvage logging in old-growth forest
reserves and roadless areas.
Copyright 2007 The Associated
Press.
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=94&SubSectionID=801&ArticleID=33896&TM=13639.2
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |