|
Ballot Measure Introduced to Stop League of CA
Cities From Spending Taxpayers Dollars in Political Campaigns
An exclusive column penned for the Flash Report by Jon
Coupal. Coupal is the President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.
November 16, 2007
If you are new to the FlashReport, please check out the
main site and the acclaimed
FlashReport Weblog on California
politics
Yesterday, the Howard Jarvis
Taxpayers Association , the
National
Taxpayer Limitation Committee and the
California Alliance to Protect
Private Property Rights introduced the "Taxpayer Protection Act of 2008," a
ballot measure that strengthens existing laws that prohibit the use of taxpayer
dollars for political activity by making it illegal for taxpayer financed
organizations, such as the League of California Cities, the California State
Association of Counties and the California Redevelopment Association to finance
their political activities through anonymous campaign accounts.
This is needed because over the past two years taxpayer
financed public agency organizations have used anonymous campaign accounts to
contribute nearly $7 million to oppose eminent domain reform ballot measures.
Unlike traditional political action committees, these so-called "non-public
funds" accounts do not disclose the source of their financing or contributors,
limiting the ability of regulatory agencies, the media and watchdog groups to
determine whether taxpayer dollars are being used to finance political
activities.
One would think that such organizations that accept taxpayer
dollars would be held to a higher standard and that they would be required to
disclose all the sources financing their political activities. But that is not
so and as a result, the consequences have put your private property rights at
risk.
In 2006, these taxpayer financed organizations contributed
more than $4.7 million from their anonymous, so-called "non-public funds"
accounts to oppose Proposition 90, an eminent domain ballot measure which was
narrowly defeated. More recently, these taxpayer financed groups have spent
over $2 million to oppose the California Property Owners and Farmland
Protection Act, a ballot measure supported by proponents of real eminent domain
reform. As evidence that these campaign accounts have become the taxpayer
funded agencies' preferred method of financing their political activities, 81%
of the money spent so far this year to oppose the Jarvis-sponsored eminent
domain reform ballot measure has come from these anonymous accounts!
As former Senator Jim Nielsen and Chairman of the California
Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights says, "This kind of political
activity certainly explains why California is not among the more than 40 states
that have reformed their eminent domain laws. These taxpayer funded
organizations should not be financing political efforts that undermine private
property rights."
Here is what the "Taxpayer Protection Act of 2008" would do:
- Require taxpayer financed organizations to fund political
activities with non-taxpayer funds and through a political committee required
to disclose receipts and expenditures like other committees.
- Ensure accountability by imposing fines and possible
imprisonment for using taxpayer dollars for political purposes.
What we have learned is that while the League of California
Cities publicly professes to be an entity that serves the "public interests,"
they claim that they are really a "business!" (Click
here
to hear it yourself) Can they really have it both ways? We don't think so
This is why organizations that accept tax dollars to
advocate the interests of the public agencies and public at large (in theory,
anyway), need to be held to the highest standard so that we can be assured that
they are representing public interests and not private interests.
When 80% of the money financing opposition to eminent domain
reform is coming from organizations which would not even exist without taxpayer
funding, greater accountability and transparency is should be mandatory. Until
we truly know whether these taxpayer financed organizations are truly serving
the public interest, the law needs to be changed to protect California
taxpayers.
(See a letter to the President of the League of
California Cities from Coupal
here.)
You can write to Jon Coupal at jon@flashreport.org.
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|