|
Are You Fit to Own Your Property?
The City of Glassboro, NJ Says No
Suleiman Arifi escaped from communist Yugoslavia in the
1960s, after serving a three-year sentence in prison for opposing communism,
and sought refuge in the United States. However, what he thought was the
"American Dream" has turned into a nightmare.
Arifi has owned a combination commercial and residential
property in downtown Glassboro since 1991, but the borough has decided that he
is no longer worthy of keeping the property that he leases to a salon/spa. In
March 2007, borough officials filed papers to acquire the property, which
includes two apartments. Because Arifi has lived with his wife in one of those
apartments for the past ten years, Glassboro would not only be taking his
livelihood and major source of income, but his home as well.
"I live here and I'm making a business here," Arifi told the
Gloucester County Times in July. "How can they do this to me in America?"
The borough would like to see the property in the hands of
Arifi's tenant Turning Heads Salon & Spa as part of "an overall
redevelopment plan" for the area-though no one really knows what that plan
is.
Town officials approached Arifi about leasing to the spa in
2005. There was a dispute over building improvements, but when Arifi applied
for funds to improve the building's facade through a federally-funded program
administered by the borough, he was denied due to other code violations the
city had found.
Arifi, who holds a M.A. in sociology and a Ph.D from a
Turkish university, relies on the revenue from renting out the property in
order to makes ends meet. He suffers from several heart conditions, including
severe coronary artery disease, and doctors have said that stress, like that
caused by fighting for your home, will threaten his life. In October, Arifi was
hospitalized due to his medical condition at the same time he was supposed to
file official protest against the condemnation. Luckily, New Jersey Superior
Court judge gave him additional time, until Nov. 18, to file papers opposing
the condemnation.
Because the borough has not gone after neighboring
businesses, Arifi believes the borough is going after him because a man of his
age and with his poor health is easy to take advantage of or exploit.
Whether or not that is true, Glassboro does not seem to have
a problem threatening the life and livelihood of one of its residents. Indeed,
borough officials seem to be fairly flippant about development plans in the
first place.
Glassboro has three other development projects in various
stages, and they have shown no signs of success. In 2000, 25 properties were
taken for a townhouse project that has not moved beyond a symbolic
groundbreaking ceremony. An almost decade-old plan with Rowan University that
includes a hotel and conference center has seen little progress. Finally, the
borough's revitalization efforts have improved one building but have lost
several businesses even after the buildings that housed them received re-hab
funds.
As for Arifi's property, the borough's economic development
attorney said it was inconsistent with the city's vision of the area.
"My understanding is that, for maintaining it as a use
that's consistent with the area, the borough thought it should acquire it,"
James Maley said.
Usually towns try to claim a property is "underutilized,"
but borough officials in Glassboro just do not think the property fits-except
that officials do not want the property put to a different use. They simply
want a different owner.
Even the local paper thinks the town's reasons for the
taking are absurd. In April, they opined, "Borough officials say
'service-oriented businesses' are slated for this part of West High Street.
With a tailor's shop, a bakery, an insurance office and a barber nearby,
Arifi's building, now occupied by Turning Heads Salon & Spa and apartments,
seems to fit fine."
Meanwhile, residents of Glassboro are still trying to figure
out why exactly borough officials get to determine who gets to own property in
their town, and they wonder how many other property owners the borough thinks
are unfit to own their own property.
[Non-text portions of this
message have been removed]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further
information please refer to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|